Yogiraj Ramchandra Tulaskar v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Government Pleader and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal for want of prosecution; refusal of further adjournment without payment of exemplary costs; principles of Dynadev Sabaji Naik v. Pradnya Khedkar (2017) 5 SCC 496 relied upon; alleged illegal structure admeasuring 561 sq.ft. at Mahim (West) enjoyed for over two years; Notice dated 2nd August 2024; Appeal from Order No. 815 of 2024 with Interim Application No. 14808 of 2024; Yogiraj Ramchandra Tulaskar v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Government Pleader & Ors.; High Court of Judicature at Bombay; Kamal Khata, J.; decision dated 23rd February 2026; earlier orders dated 16th January 2026 and 23rd January 2026; no ad-interim relief granted; office objections unremoved; illegible documents.
What did the court decide?
A request for a further adjournment/opportunity cannot be granted as a matter of course and not without putting the applicant to terms, in view of the principles laid down in Dynadev Sabaji Naik v. Pradnya Khedkar; the Appellant's Advocate declined the offer of an adjournment subject to exemplary costs.