Mohammed Mansoor Mohamed Ateeque Ansari v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail — intervention/impleadment of third party — High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction — Cri. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 828 of 2026, Niyaz Ahmad Shah Mohammed Siddiqui v. The State of Maharashtra, with Interim Application No. 1125 of 2026 by Mohammed Mansoor Mohamed Ateeque Ansari — intervention allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b); intervenor to be impleaded as party respondent; amendment forthwith; IA disposed of; stand over to 20 April 2026 — Coram: R.N. Laddha, J.; order dated 16 April 2026 — Advocates: Dr Suresh Mane with Dinesh R Sonawane (applicant in ABA/828/2026); FN Momin through VC (applicant in IA/1125/2026); M R Tidke, APP (State); Ashok Ratnaparkhi, Bhoiwada Police Station, present.
What did the court decide?
Intervention application (Interim Application No. 1125 of 2026) allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b); applicant in the anticipatory bail application directed to implead the intervenor as party respondent with necessary amendment forthwith; interim application disposed of; main matter stood over to 20 April 2026.