Janak Uttam Jain v. The State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court; Criminal Application No. 137 of 2026 with Criminal Application No. 138 of 2026; applicants Priyanka Janak Jain and Janak Uttam Jain vs State of Maharashtra; anticipatory bail granted by Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai in ABAs 2495 and 2496 of 2025; modification sought via Criminal Misc. Applications Nos. 113 and 112 of 2026 dated 17 February 2026; limited relief of expedition; Sessions Judge requested to expedite hearing and decide on merits in accordance with law; applications disposed of; Coram R.N. Laddha, J.; decided 15 April 2026; counsel Saili N Dhuru, Sangeeta E Phad (APP), Arfan Sait (APP); PSI Ingavale, Santacruz Police Station.
What did the court decide?
Limited relief only: the learned Sessions Judge requested to expedite the hearing of the pending criminal miscellaneous applications (Nos. 112 and 113 of 2026) and to decide them on their own merits and in accordance with law.