Rajendra Shankarrao Joshi v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Consolidated paucity-of-time adjournment order, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dated January 05, 2025; Coram: Sandipkumar C. More and Abasaheb D. Shinde, JJ. Matters adjourned to 02.02.2026 and 03.02.2026: CONT. PETITION NO. 813 OF 2024 (in WP/6873/2020), 818/2024, 829/2024, 895/2024, 1058/2024, 450/2025, 467/2025, 570/2025, 572/2025, 603/2025, 606/2025, 671/2025, 678/2025, 693/2025, 792/2025, 936/2025, and WRIT PETITION NO. 2010 OF 2000. Interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, to continue till the next date. Counsel noted as present include Mrs. Chaitali R. Chaudhari and Mr. N.B. Patil, AGP/APP for respondent State in respective matters. No statutes, precedents, issues or holdings; not citable for any legal proposition.
What did the court decide?
Administrative adjournment: due to paucity of time the listed matters are adjourned to the dates indicated (02.02.2026 and 03.02.2026); interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, shall continue till the next date.