Manoj Pannalal Jain v. The State of Maharashtra Through Department of Urban Development
Case brief
What is this about?
Short compliance-disposal order in three connected contempt petitions (Cont. P. Nos. 29, 30, 33 of 2026 in WP/1378/2025, WP/1363/2025, WP/1388/2025); petitioner Manoj Pannalal Jain v. State of Maharashtra (Department of Urban Development); respondents included CIDCO (Resp. 5-7) and CSMRDA (Resp. 8); de-reservation notifications for disputed land issued and taken on record; contempt petitions disposed of as orders complied with; Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; 18.02.2026; 2026:BHC-AUG:7718-DB; advocates: S.S. Khoche h/f Devdatt P Palodkar (petitioner), V.M. Jaware and Madhukar A. Aher (State AGP/APP), Vaibhav P. Deshmukh (CIDCO), Vaibhav S. Deshmukh (CSMRDA).
What did the court decide?
All three contempt petitions (Nos. 29, 30 and 33 of 2026) disposed of upon recording that the orders under contempt had been complied with; copy of the de-reservation notifications taken on record.