Dinesh Nandlal Patil v. The Union of India Through Ministry of Home Affairs
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment ('paucity of time') order dated 05/02/2026, Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad, coram Sandipkumar C. More and Abasaheb D. Shinde, JJ. Batch adjournment of criminal writ petitions (CWP 1437/2025, 1757/2025, 842/2024, 1266/2025, 1780/2025, 201/2023, 1831/2024, 1402/2025, 1480/2025), writ petitions (WP 4071/2020 with CA 8753/2025, 3388/2024, 3042/2025, 4258/2022, 4301/2022, 13993/2025, 4804/2005, 1440/2025, 1443/2025, 4188/2025, 11666/2025), contempt petitions (199/2022, 265/2024, 931/2024, 598/2016, 604/2016, 676/2017, 357/2025, 430/2025, 1094/2025) and criminal appeals (300/2023 with CA 2596/2023, 49/2004, 96/2004, 623/2003, 396/2004) to next dates 18/02/2026, 25/02/2026, 05/03/2026, 17/03/2026, 18/03/2026; interim relief/undertaking/statement to continue till next date; AGPs/APPs (incl. P. S. Patil, N. B. Patil) for respondent/State.
What did the court decide?
Batch adjournment of the listed matters to the tabulated next dates (ranging 18/02/2026 to 17/03/2026) due to paucity of time, with interim relief, undertakings or statements, if any, to continue till the next date.