Irfan Iqbal Patni v. Dipika Sadanand Khanvilkar
Case brief
What is this about?
Caveat restoration; caveat rejected under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections; Chamber Order CHOL/128/2026 in CTSL/27242/2024; setting aside rejection order dated 10.03.2025; late knowledge of Conditional Order on 21.04.2025; cost Rs. 2,500/- to petitioner; substantial justice cannot be denied on technical grounds; one opportunity to cure default; compliance praecipe within two weeks; office objections removal; registration/numbering of caveat; Prothonotary & Senior Master; listed for hearing and final disposal.
What did the court decide?
Chamber Order granted as prayed: setting aside of the Order dated 10.03.2025 rejecting the Caveat and restoration of the Caveat to file, subject to payment of Rs. 2,500/- as cost to the petitioner; caveator to remove office objections and register/number the Caveat by filing/uploading a compliance praecipe within two weeks of payment, failing which the Caveat stands rejected under O.S.Rule 986.