Dalvi and Sons, a HUF Acting Thr. Karta, Manoj Tukaram Dalvi v. M/S. Pancham Trading, Acting Thr. Proprietor, Omprakash K. Bhirani
Case brief
What is this about?
Clarification/modification of a finally decided writ petition; scope of remand confined to entitlement to arrears of license fees from 01.02.2017; preservation of Appellate Court order dated 09.10.2025 for future monthly license fees of Rs. 40,000; status of parties recorded as licensor and licensee instead of landlord and tenant; Regular Civil Suit No.37 of 2015; writ petition decided unopposed (respondent served but absent); speaking-to-minutes application (CAW 696/2026) withdrawn. Relevant to: clarificatory orders after final disposal, limits of remand directions, licensor-licensee fee disputes.
What did the court decide?
Clarification of the judgment and order dated 09.03.2026: (i) a sentence inserted at the end of paragraph 8 confining the Appellate Court to adjudication of the licensor's entitlement to arrears of license fees and preserving the 09.10.2025 direction for future license fees of Rs. 40,000 per month; (ii) parties' status to read 'licensor and licensee' instead of 'landlord and tenant'; (iii) modified order to be uploaded.