Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd. v. Sanyog Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 appointment of arbitrator; sole Arbitrator; arbitration clause No.12 of Loan Agreement; seat of arbitration Mumbai; Presolv360 appointed as arbitral institute; institutional online arbitration; Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd. v. Sanyog Kumar and Others; Respondents duly served after refusing personal and RPAD notices; Statement of Disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1); arbitrator fees per Institute Schedule borne equally subject to final Award; all merits kept open; Commercial Arbitration Application No.655 of 2025; disposed 11 March 2026; Sandeep V. Marne J.
What did the court decide?
Constitution of a sole-Arbitrator Arbitral Tribunal via institutional arbitration: Presolv360 appointed as the Institute to nominate the Arbitrator (within two weeks of intimation), with the sole Arbitrator to forward the statutory Statement of Disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) within two weeks; all merits issues expressly kept open before the Tribunal.