Executive Engineer Jigaon Project, Shegaon (Jigaon Project, Dam/ Rehabilitation, Div.) vs Ramdas S/O Baliram Sabe and Others

1 76. CAF 1052 of 2026.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.1052 OF 2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.1053 OF 2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.1543 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.3110 OF 2026

¶4

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER JIGAON PROJECT, SHEGAON (JIGAON PROJECT, DAM/REHABILITATION, DIV.)

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

RAMDAS S/O BALIRAM SABE AND OTHERS

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's orders Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

¶8

Mr. P.B. Patil, Advocate for Applicant/Appellant. Mr. S.S. Dalvi, Advocate for Applicant/Respondent No.1. Mr. H.R. Dhumale, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 & 3-State.

¶9

CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.

¶10

DATED : 06^th APRIL 2026

¶11

Heard learned Advocate for the applicant.

¶12

This is an application for condonation of delay of 83 days in filing the statutory appeal.

¶13

In response to the notice on this application, Advocate Mr. S.S. Dalvi, appears for respondent No.1. Learned AGP appears for respondent Nos.2 and 3-State.

¶14

Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the delay of 83 days occurred in the process of obtaining necessary approvals and permissions for filing statutory appeal on behalf of the applicant.

¶15

Having regard to the contents of the application and submissions advanced, the delay of 83 days does not appear to be intentional and needs to be condoned in the interest of justice. Hence, the application is allowed and the delay of 83 days in filing statutory appeal is condoned.

¶16

2 76. CAF 1052 of 2026.odt

¶17

The civil application is accordingly disposed of.

¶18

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.1053 OF 2026

¶19

This is an application filed by the appellant under Order 41, Rule 5 of C.P.C., for grant of stay to the impugned Judgment and Award dated 05.08.2025, passed by the Reference Court at Nagpur.

¶20

Learned Advocate for the appellant submits that the entire decreetal amount along with interest is deposited in this Court, in accordance with the order dated 26.02.2026, passed by this Court, and prays for grant of stay to the impugned Judgment and Award.

¶21

In view of this, interim relief granted vide order dated 26.02.2026, stands confirmed.

¶22

The civil application is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶23

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.1543 OF 2026

¶24

This is an application filed by the applicant/respondent No.1, for withdrawal of the amount of compensation deposited by the appellant in accordance with the impugned Judgment and Award dated 05.08.2025, passed by the Reference Court at Nagpur, in L.A.C. No.3038/AMT/BLD/2020.

¶25

The applicant is the original claimant whose land is acquired and is seeking withdrawal of amount of compensation. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that in identical matters, the Reference Court has allowed the claimants to withdraw 75% of amount of compensation. He submits that since the land belonging to

¶26

3 76. CAF 1052 of 2026.odt

¶27

the applicant is also acquired, he be permitted to withdraw the amount of compensation.

¶28

Although the application is opposed, considering the fact that the land belonging to the applicant was acquired and the amount of compensation is not yet received by him, at this stage the applicant needs to be permitted to withdraw 75% of amount of compensation. Hence, the application is allowed and the applicant is permitted to withdraw 50% of amount of compensation along with accrued interest, subject to the applicant furnishing usual undertaking and 25% of amount after furnishing solvent surety to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial).

¶29

In view of the above, the civil application is disposed of.

¶30

(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)

¶31

asd

Executive Engineer Jigaon Project, Shegaon (Jigaon Project, Dam/ Rehabilitation, Div.) v. Ramdas S/O Baliram Sabe and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Executive Engineer Jigaon Project, Shegaon (Jigaon Project, Dam/ Rehabilitation, Div.) v. Ramdas S/O Baliram Sabe and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Namdeo S/O Tukaram Dalvi vs Kisan S/O Laxman Dalvi and Others

Ravindra S/O Sheshrao Dhole and Others vs Smt. Kusum W/O Dattuji Gurav and Others

Manchla Vyenkateshwar Rajdu vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Department of Co-Operation, Mumbai and Ors.

Smt. Ushatai W/O Pandurang Bhamburkar vs Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and Others

Executive Engineer Jigaon Project, Shegaon (Jigaon Project, Dam/ Rehabilitation, Div.) vs Ramdas S/O Baliram Sabe and Others

Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Matsyavyaysay Shakari Sanstha Maryadit, Thr. President Ravi K. Gawai vs State of Maha., Thr. Secy., Dept. of Agri. Animal Husb. Dairy Devpt. and Fisheries, Mumbai and Ors.