Dismissed¶¶26

Sabiyabegum Mahmood Khan and Others v. Tahsildar Revenue Nanded and Others

Bombay HC14 Jan 2026CA/9813/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Recall of order dated 09/10/2024 in WP/11267/2024; Civil Application No. 9813 of 2025 (Sabiyabegum Mahmood Khan and others) and Civil Application No. 8272 of 2025 (Sakharam Digambarrao Deshmukh, died, through LRS) versus Tahsildar (Revenue), Nanded; representation dated 22/08/2024 of original petitioner; contempt petition for non-compliance; mutation of respondent No.3/original petitioner's name in revenue record; innocuous order; civil applications rejected; remedies as per law; all contentions kept open; Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench; decided 27 March 2026.

What did the court decide?

The order dated 09/10/2024 was innocuous: it merely required the authorities to take a decision on the original petitioner's representation, which they have taken; hence the applicants' challenge to it fails. ¶¶26

Sabiyabegum Mahmood Khan and Others vs Tahsildar Revenue Nanded and Others — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:BHC-AUG:13634-DB

¶2

1 995-CA-9813-25.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9813 OF 2025 IN WP/11267/2024

¶5

SABIYABEGUM MAHMOOD KHAN AND OTHERS VERSUS

¶6

THE TAHSILDAR (REVENUE), NANDED AND OTHERS

¶7

Mr. Rahil Riyazoddin Kazi, Advocate for Applicant Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for Respondent/State

¶8

Ms. Aarya Deshpande, Advocate h/f Mr. S. V. Adwant, Advocate for Petitioner in WP.

¶9

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8272 OF 2025 IN WP/11267/2024

¶10

SAKHARAM DIGAMBARRAO DESHMUKH (DIED) THROUGH LRS

¶11

VERSUS

¶12

THE TAHSILDAR REVENUE NANDED AND ANOTHER

¶13

Mr. G. R. Syed, Advocate for Applicant

¶14

Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondent/State

¶15

Ms. Aarya Deshpande, Advocate h/f Mr. S. V. Adwant, Advocate for Petitioner in WP

¶16

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ.

¶17

DATE : 27^th MARCH, 2026

¶18

PER COURT :

¶19

By these applications, the applicants seek recalling of

¶20

the order dated 09/10/2024 passed in Writ Petition No.11267/2024.

¶21

Perusal of the said order shows that this Court directed

¶22

respondent No.1 to take appropriate decision on the representation dated 22/08/2024 filed by original petitioner, in accordance with law

¶23

SVH

¶24

2 995-CA-9813-25.odt

¶25

and on it’s own merits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of the said order. Since no decision was taken pursuant to the order passed by this Court, contempt petition was filed and thereafter the respondents authorities have taken decision on the representation of the petitioner. Applicants claim that they are affected by the said decision as the name of respondent No.3 – original petitioner is mutated in the revenue record.

¶26

We are not impressed by the submissions of the applicants. Innocuous order was passed by this Court to take decision on the representation of original petitioner, which the authorities have taken. In that view of the matter, we find no merit in the civil applications and the same are, therefore, rejected.

¶27

If applicants are aggrieved by the decision taken on the representation, they have to avail remedies as per the law. All the contentions of the parties are kept open.

¶28

(VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)

¶29

SVH

Sabiyabegum Mahmood Khan and Others v. Tahsildar Revenue Nanded and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sabiyabegum Mahmood Khan and Others v. Tahsildar Revenue Nanded and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ashokkumar Ramkishan Sikchi and Ors. vs the Administrator, Cidco, Office, Jalna Road, Aurangabad and Others.

Proposed Indira Griha Nirman Sanstha Tuljapur through Its Chief Promoter and Others vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Proposed Indira Griha Nirman Sanstha Tuljapur through Its Chief Promoter and Others vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shital Arun Khade vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Sakharam Digambarrao Deshmukh Died Thr Lrs Kishor Sakharam Deshpande and Others vs the Tahsildar Revenue Nanded and Another

Anagha Sudhir Kurumbhatte vs the State of Maharashtra and Others