Allowed¶16

Administrator Cidco Aurangabad v. Radhakisan Rambhau Zalke and Ors.

Bombay HC5 Jan 2026CA/9277/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay 1204 days; Administrator CIDCO Aurangabad; Radhakisan Rambhau Zalke and Ors; First Appeal FAST/22390/2025; Civil Application No. 9277 of 2025; Civil Application No. 9278 of 2025; Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench; Shailesh P. Brahme; ad-interim relief continued; cheque of amount directed to be deposited; public exchequer; appeal admitted; waiver of service of notice; AGP; Record and Proceeding; print dispensed with; dated 09.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 1204 days in preferring the appeal condoned; Civil Application allowed; appeal admitted; ad-interim relief continued till the Office accepts the cheque of the amount directed to be deposited by the Court. ¶16

Administrator Cidco Aurangabad vs Radhakisan Rambhau Zalke and Ors. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶16

Issue for consideration

Whether the delay of 1204 days in preferring the appeal by the applicant (Administrator, CIDCO Aurangabad) should be condoned.

¶13

Court's answer

The Court found no reason to doubt the bonafides of the applicant, noting that the condonation of delay has repercussions on the public exchequer.

¶15

Ratio / Principle

The Civil Application is allowed and the delay of 1204 days stands condoned.

¶16

Key takeaways

Ad-interim relief shall be continued until the Office accepts the cheque of the amount directed to be deposited by the Court.ratio¶12
The First Appeal is admitted; the learned AGP waived service of notice for respondent no.3 and Mr. A. B. Kale waived service of notice for respondent nos.1 and 2; Record and Proceeding was called for and print dispensed with.ratio¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad (Shailesh P. Brahme, J.), order dated 09.02.2026 in Civil Application No. 9277 of 2025 (with Civil Application No. 9278 of 2025) in First Appeal FAST/22390/2025: The Administrator, CIDCO Aurangabad, sought condonation of a delay of 1204 days in preferring the appeal. The Court found no reason to doubt the applicant's bonafides, observing that the condonation has repercussions on the public exchequer, allowed the Civil Application and condoned the delay. Counsel for the applicant was armed with a cheque of the amount directed to be deposited by the Court; the Office was directed to accept the cheque and ad-interim relief was continued till then. The First Appeal was admitted, with the learned AGP waiving notice for respondent no.3 and Mr. A. B. Kale waiving notice for respondent nos.1 and 2; call for Record and Proceeding issued and print dispensed with.

Administrator Cidco Aurangabad v. Radhakisan Rambhau Zalke and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Administrator Cidco Aurangabad v. Radhakisan Rambhau Zalke and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vikram Alias Vikybaba Shamrao Goyar vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shriram Madhav More and Ors. Vs Abdul Khalid Abdul Samad Patel and Ors.

Mubarak Badesab Mulla Vs Hujur Badesab Mulla and Ors.

Himmat Bhaurao Madan (Died through Lrs.) Ashok and Anr. vs the Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division Jalna and Others.

Ganpat Govindrao Kavle (Died) Thr. Lrs Sundar Ganpat Kavale and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra through the Collector Jalna and Ors.

The Executive Engineer Irrigation Department Strengthing Division Omerga District Osmanabad vs Dhanaji Appa Gaikawad and Ors.