Disposed

The Branch Manager New India Insurance Corrected as Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Sojar Nana Katari and Others

Bombay HC29 Mar 2026CA/8794/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lok Adalat disposal order dated 29.03.2026 of the Special Lok Adalat, High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, covering a batch of First Appeals (FA Nos. 2607/2015, 834/2014, 156/2017, 393/2019, 2115/2019, 614/2025, 628/2025, 782/2025, 2149/2022, 615/2025) and companion Civil Applications (incl. CA Nos. 10000/2008 in FA/156/2017, 8794/2024 in FA/628/2025, 469 & 470/2018 in FAST/215/2018, 12323 & 12

What did the court decide?

All First Appeals disposed of upon the appellant-Insurance Company's acceptance of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awards and withdrawal pursis; claimants permitted to withdraw compensation deposit

The Branch Manager New India Insurance Corrected as Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sojar Nana Katari and Others — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:BHC-AUG:15637

¶2

1 9-FA-2607-15.odt

¶3

BEFORE THE SPECIAL LOK ADALAT AT HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD HELD ON 29^th MARCH, 2026

¶4

Organized by High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad under section 19, of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)

¶5

9 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2607 OF 2015

¶6

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

SINDHU RAOSAHEB JONDHALE AND ANOTHER

¶9

WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 834 OF 2014

¶10

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

¶11

VERSUS

¶12

RANJANA VILAS WAGHMARE AND ANOTHER

¶13

12 FIRST APPEAL NO. 156 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10000 OF 2008 IN FA/156/2017

¶14

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LIMITED.

¶15

VERSUS KARBHARI BABURAO GAADAWE AND OTHERS

¶16

16 FIRST APPEAL NO. 393 OF 2019

¶17

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LIMITED., THR ITS SR. DIV. MANAGER, AURANGABAD

¶18

VERSUS KANTABAI BHAGWAN PALASPAGAR AND OTHERS

¶19

19 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2115 OF 2019

¶20

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LIMITED. THROUGH ITS IN-CHARGE (LEGAL HUB) RAVIKANT RAJENDRA YADAV

¶21

VERSUS

¶22

CHHAYA SUKHDEO WAGH AND OTHERS

¶23

27 FIRST APPEAL NO. 614 OF 2025

¶24

THE BRANCH MANAGER NEW INDIA INSURANCE CORRECTED AS ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

¶25

VERSUS

¶26

CHAYA DIPAK KATARI AND ASOTHER

¶27

2 9-FA-2607-15.odt

¶28

28 FIRST APPEAL NO. 628 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8794 OF 2024 IN FA/628/2025

¶29

THE BRANCH MANAGER NEW INDIA INSURANCE CORRECTED AS ASSURANCE CO LIMITED

¶30

VERSUS

¶31

SOJAR NANA KATARI AND OTHERS

¶32

29 FIRST APPEAL NO. 782 OF 2025

¶33

THE BRANCH MANAGER NEW INDIA INSURANCE CORRECTED AS

¶34

ASSURANCE CO LIMITED

¶35

VERSUS

¶36

DURGABAI ASHOK SHINDE AND OTHERS

¶37

43 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 469 OF 2018 IN FAST/215/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 470 OF 2018 IN FAST/215/2018

¶38

NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LIMITED., THROUGH ITS DIV. MANAGER, AURANGABAD

¶39

VERSUS

¶40

BABANOTHERAO BALAJI RAUT AND OTHERS

¶41

45 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12323 OF 2018 IN FAST/29231/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12324 OF 2018 IN FAST/29231/2018

¶42

THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LIMITED.,

¶43

AURANGABAD

¶44

VERSUS

¶45

SAKHARBAI LAXMAN KUSALKAR AND OTHERS

¶46

46 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13342 OF 2024 IN FA/2149/2022

¶47

MAHADEV SHRIMANT GARAD

¶48

VERSUS

¶49

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LIMITED, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS

¶50

WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2149 OF 2022

¶51

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LIMITED., AURANGABAD

VERSUS

PRIYA RAHUL GAIKWAD

3 9-FA-2607-15.odt

FIRST APPEAL NO.615 OF 2025

¶56

THE BRANCH MANAGER NEW INDIA INSURANCE CORRECTED AS

¶57

ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD

¶58

VERSUS

¶59

SHAKILABAI HARSING KATARI AND ANOTHER

¶60

Advocate for Appellant-Insurance company : Mr. Shrikrishna R. Bodade

¶61

HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE (Head of the Panel)

¶62

SHRI. S. G. SHETE (Retd. District Judge)

¶63

SHRI. A. M. PHULE (Advocate) (Member)

¶64

ORDER

¶65

Not on board. First Appeal No.615 of 2025 is taken on board.

¶66

Heard. Delay caused in filing appeal is condoned. Civil Applications for delay also stand/s disposed of.

¶67

Learned Advocate Mr. S. R. Bodade for the appellant and Mr.Sandesh Kamalakar, Mr. Shankar Sangale and Mr. Dinesh Bankar, authorised signatories of the appellant-Insurance company, are present.

¶68

The appellant-Insurance Company has placed on record withdrawal pursis and Authority Letter dated 25.03.2026 in the name of aforesaid respective authorized signatories in each matter. The same are taken on record and marked as Exhibit ‘X’ and ‘X-1’, for identification, in each matter.

¶69

The appellant has accepted the awards passed by the concerned Motor

¶70

Accident Claims Tribunals, in all these Motor Accident Claim Petitions.

¶71

4 9-FA-2607-15.odt

¶72

Learned Advocate for the appellant submitted that the amounts of compensation have been deposited with the Registry of this Court. As such, the respective claimants are permitted to withdraw the amounts of compensation along with accrued interest thereon till date as per the directions of the concerned Tribunal without further reference to the order of this Court.

¶73

The award be drawn up accordingly.

¶74

In view of the withdrawal pursis, all these First Appeals stand disposed of. Pending Civil Application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed of.

¶75

The appellant-Insurance Company undertakes to communicate the withdrawal of First Appeals to the claimants and their Advocate.

¶76

In all these matters, the request of refund of court fees shall be processed by the office in accordance with law.

¶77

(A. M. PHULE) (S. G. SHETE) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) MEMBER RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE HEAD OF THE PANEL

¶78

Date: 29.03.2026 Place: Aurangabad

¶79

ysk

The Branch Manager New India Insurance Corrected as Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Sojar Nana Katari and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Branch Manager New India Insurance Corrected as Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Sojar Nana Katari and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases