The Cidco Office Aurangabad v. Dipak Digamber Pande and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Land acquisition compensation withdrawal; Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; claimant applicants permitted to receive 70% of deposited amount with accrued interest on furnishing undertaking, balance 30% on solvent surety/security to the satisfaction of Registrar (Judicial); disbursement in joint account of applicants in equal proportion; reliance on order dated 05.04.2024 in First Appeal No.397 of 2024 (where 75% deposit was withdrawn); acquiring body CIDCO had deposited only 70% of total compensation; condonation of 70 days delay in preferring first appeal allowed; first appeal admitted; interim relief confirmed; Reference Court award (rent) challenged; Judge Shailesh P. Brahme; decided 11.02.2026.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal application allowed partly: applicants permitted to receive 70% of the deposited amount with accrued interest on furnishing an undertaking, and the balance 30% on furnishing solvent surety/security to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial); disbursement in the joint account of the applicants in equal proportion. Delay of 70 days in preferring the first appeal condoned; first appeal admitted; civil application for stay disposed of with interim relief standing confirmed.