Sushil Dinesh Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Under Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order dated 13.02.2026, Aurangabad Bench, Bombay High Court; judges Arun R. Pedneker and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav; batch listing of writ petitions WP 4551/2021 through WP 11436/2025 (with several civil applications); matters adjourned to 20.04.2026, 22.04.2026 and 23.04.2026 due to paucity of time; interim relief/undertaking/statement to continue till next date; no parties, advocates, statutes, cited cases, issues or holdings stated; useful only for confirming continuity of interim orders, not for legal argument.
What did the court decide?
Purely administrative adjournment: owing to paucity of time, the listed batch of writ petitions (led by WP 4551/2021) is adjourned to 20.04.2026, 22.04.2026 and 23.04.2026, and the interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, in these matters shall continue till the next date. ¶7