Allowed

Ankush Ramchandra Devkar. v. the State of Maharashtra through the Collector Jalna and Others.

Bombay HC18 Mar 2026CA/40/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

condonation of delay | civil applications in first appeals (FAST) | High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench | SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. | 18.03.2026 | applicants: Sakhahari Nivrutti Waghmare, Uddhav Raut, Premchand Ashruba Kharat, Ankush Ramchandra Devkar, Pradip Shivdas Rathod, Pandurang Jijasaheb Solanke | respondent: State of Maharashtra through Collector, Jalna | interest and statuto

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay in filing the six first appeals (FAST/13172/2025, FAST/16001/2025, FAST/31857/2025, FAST/31864/2025, FAST/32599/2025 and FAST/31889/2025), conditioned on forfeiture of interest an

Ankush Ramchandra Devkar. Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Collector Jalna and Others. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 7- CA.7816-25 (7 to 13).odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

7 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7816 OF 2025

¶4

IN FAST/13172/2025 SAKHAHARI NIVRUTTI WAGHMARE AND ANR

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.

¶7

AND

¶8

8 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8302 OF 2025 IN FAST/16001/2025 UDDHAV S/O SUDAMRAV RAUT

¶9

VERSUS

¶10

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, JALNA COLLECTOR OFFICE JALNA AND OTHERS

¶11

AND

¶12

10 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2026 IN FAST/31857/2025 PREMCHAND ASHRUBA KHARAT.

¶13

VERSUS

¶14

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS.

¶15

AND

¶16

11 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 40 OF 2026 IN FAST/31864/2025

¶17

ANKUSH RAMCHANDRA DEVKAR.

¶18

VERSUS

¶19

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS.

¶20

AND

¶21

12 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2026 IN FAST/32599/2025 PRADIP S/O SHIVDAS RATHOD AND ORS.

¶22

VERSUS

¶23

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.

¶24

AND

¶25

2 7- CA.7816-25 (7 to 13).odt

¶26

13 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 67 OF 2026

¶27

IN FAST/31889/2025 PANDURANG JIJASAHEB SOLANKE.

¶28

VERSUS

¶29

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS.

¶30

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Kakde S. M. AGPs for Respondent/s-State : Mr. V. V. Jahagirdar, Mr. S. N. Morampalle, Mr. N. D. Raje, respectively.

¶31

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 18.03.2026

¶32

PER COURT :-

¶33

Heard both sides.

¶34

Applicants seek to condone delay and they have placed

¶35

on record chart which is as follows :

¶36

3 7- CA.7816-25 (7 to 13).odt

¶37

Learned AGPs have opposed the respective applications for condonation of delay.

¶38

The averments of the applications have not been controverted by the respondents. I find no malafides on the part of the applicants to approach this Court belatedly. The delay is not intentional. Applicants are ready to forego the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period.

¶39

In case of first two matters i.e. Civil Application Nos.7816 of 2025 and 8302 of 2025, applicants shall not be entitled for interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period and period of lapses from the date of filing applications till passing of the first order.

¶40

Civil applications are allowed accordingly and the delay caused in filing first appeals stands condoned on condition that applicants shall not be entitled to interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. They are deprived of benefits for lapses in above referred matters also.

¶41

First Appeals

¶42

Matters shall be decided finally at the admission stage on the next date.

¶43

4 7- CA.7816-25 (7 to 13).odt

¶44

Call for Record and Proceedings from the concerned

¶45

Court.

¶46

9. Print is dispensed with.

¶47

(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)

¶48

vmk/-

Ankush Ramchandra Devkar. v. the State of Maharashtra through the Collector Jalna and Others.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankush Ramchandra Devkar. v. the State of Maharashtra through the Collector Jalna and Others.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases