Sadu Dhanraj Chavan and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; adjournment order for paucity of time; interim relief/undertaking/statement continued till next date; Rajnish R. Vyas, Judge; First Appeal No. 1823 of 2018; Gopal Tukaram Pate v. The State of Maharashtra and Another; companion matters Civil Application No. 105 of 2025 in FA/2543/2018 and First Appeal Nos. 2540, 2541, 2542, 2543 of 2018; other listed matters adjourned to 22-04-2026, 23-04-2026 and 24-04-2026; no merits, statutes or precedents decided.
What did the court decide?
All matters listed on the sheet were adjourned to the dates indicated against them (22-04-2026, 23-04-2026 and 24-04-2026) due to paucity of time, and any existing interim relief/undertaking/statement in these matters was directed to continue till the next date. ¶¶13