Partly allowed

Sukhshala Sunderrao Shelke v. the Union of India through the General Manager Central Railway Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus Administ

Bombay HC8 Jan 2026CA/109/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of deposited amount by claimants; undertaking to Registrar (Judicial); parity with similarly situated matters; respondent-acquiring body (Central Railway / Union of India); civil applications in First Appeals and First Appeal Stamps; Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; Shailesh P. Brahme, J.; decided 08 January 2026; civil applications allowed partly and disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Permission to receive the entire amount deposited by the acquiring body with accrued interest, on furnishing undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.

Sukhshala Sunderrao Shelke Vs the Union of India through the General Manager Central Railway Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus Administ — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 931 to 933 & 938 ca 11674.25

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

931 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11674 OF 2025 IN

¶4

FIRST APPEAL NO. 2930 OF 2025

¶5

Rukhminibai Radhakisan Shelke Since deceased through his L.Rs. Purushottam Radhakisan Shelke

¶6

.. Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

Union of India through the General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai and others

¶9

.. Respondents

¶10

AND 932 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11828 OF 2025 IN

¶11

FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 32034 OF 2024

¶12

Rukmin Karbhari Savant .. Applicant

¶13

Versus

¶14

Union of India through the General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai and others

¶15

.. Respondents

¶16

AND 933 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11832 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 14521 OF 2024

¶17

Sudhakar Abhimanyu Mundhe Since deceased through his L.Rs. Mangal Sudhakar Mundhe and others .. Applicants

¶18

Versus

¶19

Union of India through the General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai and others

¶20

.. Respondents

¶21

AND

¶22

2 931 to 933 & 938 ca 11674.25

¶23

938 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 109 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 32030 OF 2024

¶24

Sukhshala Sunderrao Shelke .. Applicant

¶25

Versus

¶26

Union of India through the General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai and others .. Respondents

¶27

Shri Shashikant E. Shekade, Advocate for the Applicant in all matters.

¶28

Ms. Mayuri G. Kasturkar, Advocate Shri Ajay G. Talhar, Advocate for the Respondents/Union. Shri S. N. Morampalle and Shri S. V. Hange, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State in respective matters.

¶29

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 08TH JANUARY, 2026.

¶30

FINAL ORDER :

¶31

. Applicants pray for permission to withdraw amount deposited by the respondent - acquiring body. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that in the similarly situated matters this Court has already permitted the claimants to receive the amount on furnishing undertaking. Applicants are also entitled to receive the amount.

¶32

For the reasons stated in the applications, the civil applications are allowed partly. The applicants are permitted to receive entire amount deposited with accrued interest on furnishing undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar

¶33

3 931 to 933 & 938 ca 11674.25

¶34

(Judicial) of this Court. The civil applications are disposed of.

¶35

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ]

¶36

bsb/Jan. 26

Sukhshala Sunderrao Shelke v. the Union of India through the General Manager Central Railway Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus Administ

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukhshala Sunderrao Shelke v. the Union of India through the General Manager Central Railway Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus Administ

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases