Disposed¶27

Vijay Dattatray Patil v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC6 Apr 2026BA/611/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

bail application; interim order; notice issued returnable 21.04.2026; A.P.P. waiver of service for respondent-State; call for papers from concerned police station; State of Maharashtra; Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad; Shailesh P. Brahme, J.; decided 06.04.2026; applicants: Vishal Alias Sachin Suresh Gaikwad, Vijay Dattatray Patil, Raju Murlidhar Khandale, Amol Vasudev Koli, Sanjay Rangnath Ugale, Pranit Bhagwat Mhaske; Bail Application Nos. 610, 611, 491, 489, 616, 618, 621, 633 of 2026; no merits decision, no ratio.

What did the court decide?

Interim directions only: notice issued to the respondent-State, returnable on 21.04.2026; A.P.P.s waived service for the State in the respective matters; Court called for papers from the concerned police station. The bail applications were not decided on merits. ¶27

Vijay Dattatray Patil vs the State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 65 to 70 ba 610.26

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

65 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 610 OF 2026

¶4

Vishal Alias Sachin Suresh Gaikwad .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

¶5

Shri Sunil B. Surse, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. P. V. Diggikar, A.P.P. for the Respondent – State.

¶6

AND

¶7

66 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 611 OF 2026 WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 491 OF 2026 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 489 OF 2026

¶8

Vijay Dattatray Patil .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

¶9

Shri B. G. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri C. V. Bhadane, A.P.P. for the Respondent – State.

¶10

AND 67 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 616 OF 2026

¶11

Raju Murlidhar Khandale .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

¶12

Shri V. V. Bhavthankar, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri G. O. Wattamwar, A.P.P. for the Respondent – State.

¶13

AND 68 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 618 OF 2026

¶14

Amol Vasudev Koli .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

¶15

Shri Samadhan H. Jadhav, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri N. R Dayma, A.P.P. for the Respondent – State.

¶16

2 65 to 70 ba 610.26

¶17

AND

¶18

69 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 621 OF 2026

¶19

Sanjay Rangnath Ugale .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

¶20

Shri Nikhil S. Jaju, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri A. R. Kale, Addl.P.P. for the Respondent – State.

¶21

AND

¶22

70 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 633 OF 2026

¶23

Pranit Bhagwat Mhaske .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

¶24

Shri Rahul R. Sonwane, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri S. V. Hange, A.P.P. for the Respondent – State.

¶25

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 06TH APRIL, 2026.

¶26

ORDER :

¶27

. Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 21.04.2026. Learned A. P. P. waive service for the respondent – State in respective matters.

¶28

Call for papers from the concern police station.

¶29

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ]

¶30

bsb/April 26

Vijay Dattatray Patil v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Dattatray Patil v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mahadev Bhagwan Pawar and Others vs Vishnu Vithoba Bhosale and Others

Madhavrao @ Mahadu S/O. Abasaheb Najan (Died) through His Legal Repr. Dilip. vs the State of Maharshtra through the Collector Parbhani and Ors.

Bhagwan S/O. Baburao Ghodke and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra through District Collector Parbhani and Ors.

Limbaji Keruji Salve vs the State of Maharashtra through the Collector Jalna and Ors.

Muktiram Raybhan Barkule vs the State of Maharashtra through Collector, Jalna and Ors.

Gemsing Mehram Rathod vs the State of Maharashtra