arrest as soon as may be. Every word used by the Magistrate needs to be given its intended meaning. In spite of being fully conscious of the fact that there was a provision under CRPC requiring communication of full particulars of the offences or other grounds of such arrest that too forthwith on arrest, deviation is made therefrom and under the NDPS Act such communication is restricted to information only. Dictionary/ordinary meaning of the terms communication and information is different. Information cannot be equated with communication. Communication involves information by sender and understanding of the said information by the recipient. On the other hand, information does not contemplate such reciprocate understanding. In such circumstances, this Court finds no reason to accept the contention of the learned Counsel for the Applicant with regard to Applicant having no knowledge of Marathi language. In any case, as stated above, during the course of remand or even at the time of filing of application for bail, no such grievance is made and as such, there is reason to believe that the Applicant was duly informed with the grounds of arrest and fully knowing the same, he defended himself during remand as well as filed application for bail. Needless to say that the Applicant was duly represented by the lawyer of his own choice since the time of first remand till decision of his application for bail before the Special Court. Thus, no prejudice can be said to have been caused by non information of the grounds of arrest to the Applicant in Marathi language. Similarly, this Court
