Satish Manikrao Ingale v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC6 Feb 2026BA/461/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application withdrawn with liberty to reapply; Crime No. 05/2023; Sections 364, 302, 201, 120-B, 34 IPC; liberty to file fresh bail application before Trial Court after 6 months if no progress in trial, to be considered on own merits; Satish Manikrao Ingale v. State of Maharashtra; Bombay High Court, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; Ashwin D. Bhobe, J.; 10th June 2026; matter taken up out of turn at request of outstation counsel; unopposed by State APP.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the Bail Application with liberty to move the Trial Court after a period of 6 months if there is no progress in trial; any fresh application thereafter to be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. ¶¶22

Satish Manikrao Ingale vs State of Maharashtra — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2026)

¶1

49-BA-461-2026.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 461 OF 2026

¶4

Satish Manikrao Ingale … Applicant Versus The State Of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶5

Mr. Sanket Palnitkar a/w Gaurish Satpute, Sumit K. Abhay A., for the Applicant.

¶6

Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for the Respondent – State.

¶7

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 10^th June, 2026.

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

This Petition is at Serial No. 49. At 11:00 am, Mr. Sanket

¶10

Palnitkar, learned Advocate for the Applicant made a request to

¶11

take up this matter out of turn as he is an outstation Counsel. Request made by him is not opposed to by Mr. Ameet Palkar, learned APP. As such, this matter is taken up out of turn post lunch.

¶12

By the present Bail Application, the Applicant has sought

¶13

for the following relief in terms of prayer clause (B):-

¶14

B. The applicants may kindly be ordered to be released on bail in connection with crime no. 05/2023 came to be registered in for the U/S 364,

Arjun

49-BA-461-2026.doc

302, 201, 120-B , 34 of Indian Penal Code.

¶19

After having heard the matter for sometime, Mr. Sanket Palnitkar, learned Advocate for the Applicant on instructions from the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present Application with liberty to move the Trial Court after a period of 6 months from today if there is no progress in trial. The request made by Mr. Sanket Palnitkar, is not opposed to by Mr. Ameet Palkar, learned APP for the Respondent – State.

¶20

In view of the statement made by Mr. Sanket Palnitkar, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty as prayed.

¶21

If any fresh Bail Application is filed before the Trial Court after 6 months in the event there is no progress in trial, same be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.

¶22

Bail Application No. 461 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶23

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)

¶24

Digitally signed by ARJUN ARJUN KRISHNA KRISHNA RODGE RODGE Date: 2026.06.12 10:18:34 +0530

¶25

Arjun

¶26

Satish Manikrao Ingale v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satish Manikrao Ingale v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Satyavrat Raghavendra Tripathi and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Vijay Babasaheb Sale vs Union of India and Anr.

Salman Salim Khan @ Salman Khan and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Reshma Aatif Khan vs State of Maharashtra

Amol Kisanrao Jadhav and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rohit Kisan Madane vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.