Krushna Alias Amol Angad Pandhare v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC27 Jan 2026BA/3509/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court Kolhapur Circuit Bench; bail application withdrawn; permission to withdraw bail application; liberty to file fresh bail application before trial court; trial to be concluded within three months; Krushna @ Amol Angad Pandhare v. State of Maharashtra; Rajendra Hanumant Pawar interim application disposed; Mohol Police Station Solapur Gramin; no bail merits decided; Mrs. Vrushali V. Joshi, J.; 3 February 2026.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw Bail Application No. 3509 of 2025 with liberty to file a fresh application before the trial Court if the trial is not concluded within three months; the connected Interim Application No. 3615 of 2025 also stands disposed of. ¶¶24

Krushna Alias Amol Angad Pandhare vs State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶24

Issue for consideration

Whether bail should be granted to the applicant Krushna @ Amol Angad Pandhare in Bail Application No. 3509 of 2025.

¶¶20

Court's answer

Permission granted to the applicant to withdraw the bail application, with liberty to file a fresh application before the trial Court if the trial is not concluded within a period of three months.

¶¶20

Ratio / Principle

The Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶¶24

Key takeaways

In view of the disposal of the Bail Application, the Interim Application pending therein also stands disposed of.ratio¶¶26

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail Application No. 3509 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction); Coram: Mrs. Vrushali V. Joshi, J.; decided 3 February 2026. Applicant Krushna @ Amol Angad Pandhare sought bail from the State of Maharashtra; Rajendra Hanumant Pawar had filed Interim Application No. 3615 of 2025 in the bail application. After hearing both sides, the Court showed disinclination to grant bail; counsel for the applicant then sought permission to withdraw the application with liberty to file a fresh application before the trial Court if the trial is not concluded within three months. Permission was granted; the bail application stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, and the pending interim application also stands disposed of. No issue on the merits of bail was decided; no statute or precedent was cited. Mr. Shinde, PC/428, Mohol Police Station (Solapur Gramin), was present; Mr. Ritesh M. Thobde with Mr. Darshan Singh Rajpurohit appeared for the applicant, Mr. Nitin B. Patil, APP, for the Respondent-State, and Mr. Krishna Mushan for the (unnamed) intervenor.

Krushna Alias Amol Angad Pandhare v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krushna Alias Amol Angad Pandhare v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pooja Ganesh Dixit @ Pooja Siddhaam Potdar vs Ganesh Kiran Dixit

Yashwant Buimrao Suryavanshi and Anr. vs Hindurao Bhimrao Suryavanshi Since Deceased Thr. Lrs. Dinkar H. Suryawanshi Thr. Lrs.

Shri Ananda Bhagwan Mohite vs Hindurao Ramchandra Mohite and Anr.

Hirabai Mahadeo Alias Madhav Savant vs the State of Maharashtra

Vishal Tanaji Chavan vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Anantrao Vaijinath Patil vs the State of Maharashtra