Bail applications were not entertained after hearing; counsel sought withdrawal on instructions, and the court dismissed the applications as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
36-BA-140-2026 (CR).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 140 OF 2026 AND CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 141 OF 2026
Ratnakar Alias Namdev Siddheshwar Dalavi VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Mr. Jadhavar Abhay Arjun, Mr. Rutik Kashid, Advocate for Applicant Dr. A. A. Takalkar APP for the State in BA 140/2026 Mr. Nitin B. Patil APP for the State in BA 141/2026
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 11th MARCH 2026.
IRESH
MASHAL
Digitally signed by IRESHMASHAL Date: 2026.03.12 12:50:07 +0530
P.C.
entertain the applications, learned counsel for the applicant on instructions seeks withdrawal of the applications.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
Iresh
Ratnakar Alias Namdev Siddheshwar Dalavi
The State Of Maharashtra
Another
Sachin S. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
