Bhura Sitaram Kirad v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC24 Mar 2026BA/1194/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application withdrawn with liberty to move the Trial Court; offence under S. 302 r/w. 34 IPC (murder with common intention); C.R. No. 547 of 2023, Dighi Police Station, Pune; Session Case No. 121 of 2024, Sessions Court Pune; earlier order dated 08.09.2025 in Bail Application 113 of 2025; withdrawal request unopposed by APP; matter taken up out of turn; Bombay High Court, Ashwin D. Bhobe, J.; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw the Bail Application and to file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court; no relief granted on the merits of the bail prayer. ¶¶29

Bhura Sitaram Kirad vs the State of Maharashtra — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2026)

¶1

100-BA-1194-2026.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1194 OF 2026

¶4

Bhura Sitaram Kirad … Applicant Versus The State Of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶5

Mr. Aniket Vagal a/w Ms. Savvy Kolhekar a/w Ms. Juhi Kadu, for the Applicant.

¶6

Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent – State.

¶7

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 11^th June, 2026.

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

This Bail Application is listed at Serial No. 100 on today’s

¶10

Daily Board. Mentioned out of turn.

¶11

At 11.00 a.m., Mr. Aniket Vagal, learned Advocate for the

¶12

Applicant, requested for taking up this matter out of turn. At his

¶13

request, this Bail Application was taken up out of turn.

¶14

Heard Mr. Aniket Vagal, learned Advocate for the Applicant

¶15

and Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, learned APP for the Respondent-

State.

Vivekanand

100-BA-1194-2026.doc

By the present Application, the Applicant has sought for the following relief in terms of prayer clause b.

¶21

“He may kindly be released on bail in connection with C.R. No. 547 of 2023 registered with the Dighi Police Station, Pune and in Session Case No. 121 of 2024 pending before the Session Court Pune for the offences punishable u/s.302 r/w. 34 of IPC on such terms and conditions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.”

¶22

Mr. Aniket Vagal, learned Advocate for the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Bail Application to approach the Trial Court in terms of the order dated 08.09.2025 passed in Bail Application 113 of 2025 (at page no. 65 of paper book). Request made by Mr. Aniket Vagal, learned Advocate for the Applicant is not opposed by Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, learned APP for the Respondent-State.

¶23

In view of the statement made by Mr. Aniket Vagal, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court.

Vivekanand

100-BA-1194-2026.doc