Disposed¶14
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Sudhir v R
Bombay HCARBP/384/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Adjournment order dated 12-03-2026 by Arif S. Doctor, J., High Court of Bombay OOCJ, in Arbitration Petition No. 384 of 2024 (listed with Arbitration Application No. 30 of 2026): Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd (petitioner, counsel Tikshta Modi with Simran Raj and Vedika Pedhambkar) v. Sudhir V R (respondent). Time sought by respondent's counsel as arguing counsel was unavailable; matter stood over to 18-03-2026, High on Board. No statutes, precedents, issues, holdings or quantum; impugned order not identified.
What did the court decide?
Adjournment granted at the request of learned counsel for the Respondent, whose arguing counsel was unavailable; matter stood over to 18th March, 2026, High on Board. No substantive relief decided. ¶14