Sai Industries v. High Rise Mep Services Pvt. Ltd.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, S.11 – Appointment of arbitrator
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court (OO CJ), Arbitration Application No. 64 of 2026, Gautam A. Ankhad J., decided 28 April 2026: Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 appointment of arbitrator; Sai Industries v. High Rise MEP Services Pvt. Ltd.; non-payment under Work Order/Purchase Order dated 1 April 2022; Clause 17 arbitration agreement; part-payment and unpaid balance of invoices; demand/pre-arbitration notice 23 January 2024; failed mediation; arbitration invoked 12 August 2024; Presolv360 ODR institution to appoint sole arbitrator; online arbitration; costs shared equally initially; application disposed of.
What did the court decide?
All disputes and differences between the parties under the Purchase Order dated 1st April 2022 and the consequential invoices raised thereunder referred to arbitration; Presolv360 (ODR institution) directed to appoint a sole arbitrator, in compliance with the Act and its own rules, within two weeks of receipt of a copy of the Order; proceedings to be conducted online through electronic mode unless otherwise agreed; communications to the email addresses provided by the parties to constitute valid service; arbitral costs and fees borne by the parties equally in the first instance, subject to any final Award on costs; seat of arbitration deemed to be the same as the seat discernible from the Agreement.