Yogesh Khushal Gajapure vs Durga Yogesh Gajapure

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,__________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

¶11

and Registrar's Orders.

¶12

Mr. A.V. Pande, Advocate for the Applicant. None present for the Non-applicants.

¶13

CORAM : M.M. NERLIKAR, J. DATE : JUNE 12, 2026.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the

¶15

applicant.

¶16

The present application is filed for condonation of delay of 120 days. The learned counsel for the applicant has invited my attention to paragraph No.2 of the application.

¶17

I have gone through the paragraph No.2 of the application. In my opinion, sufficient cause and explanation was given for delay. I accept the same. It would be useful to reproduce paragraph No.2, which reads thus:-

¶18

“ 2. Pertinently, the Applicant was although available with his defence regarding adultery committed by the Non-Applicant No.1 during

¶19

Piyush Mahajan

¶20

2 49-Cr.APPR-33-2026

¶21

pendency of the proceedings in question before the learned Family Court No.3, Nagpur. However, the Applicant received proof by way of a photograph qua the second marriage of the NonApplicant No.1 only on 20.01.2026 via WhatsApp, a copy of which is annexed with the accompanying revision application. As such, the same prompted the Applicant to prefer the accompanying revision application. The Applicant does not have resources to engage a counsel and as such, it took some time for him to arrange for an amount appropriate for miscellaneous expenses enabling filing of the present application and the accompanying revision application. On account of the Applicant receiving proof of adultery of the Non-Applicant No.1 only on 20.01.2026 and on account of time taken for arrangement of miscellaneous expenses in preferring the instant proceedings, a delay of 120 days is caused in preferring the accompanying revision application.”

¶22

For the reasons stated in paragraph No.2, I am inclined to condone the delay of 120 days. Hence, the following order:-

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

(i) The Criminal Application [APPR] No.33/2026 is allowed;

¶25

(ii) The delay of 120 days caused in filing the revision application is hereby condoned;

¶26

Register the Criminal Revision Application, accordingly. List the Criminal Revision Application on 30/06/2026.

Piyush Mahajan

3

49-Cr.APPR-33-2026

Interim stay granted by this Court by an order dated 20/02/2026 is hereby continued till next date.

¶31

[ M.M. NERLIKAR, J ]

¶32

Piyush Mahajan

Yogesh Khushal Gajapure v. Durga Yogesh Gajapure

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogesh Khushal Gajapure v. Durga Yogesh Gajapure

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Madhukar S/O Bhikaji Khadse and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Jaulka, Tq. Malegaon Dist. Washim

Ankit S/O Radheshyam Biranwar vs State of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Ram Nagar, Gondia

Ajay S/O Laxman Shelke vs State of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Vasantnagar, Pusad, Tq Pusad Dist. Yavatmal

Siddharth S/O Pralhad Chimane vs State of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Ranpratap Nagar, Nagpur

Devendra Alias Bhuru Chunnilal vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Goregaon, Dist Gondia

Alfred S/O Logras Anthony vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Ballarpur Dist. Chandrapur