Partly allowed

Rakesh S/O Ramkishor Khurana v. the State of Maharashtra through Pso Ps Kelwad (Nagpur Rular ) and Economic Offenses With Nagpur

Bombay HC10 Apr 2026APPP/1203/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail-condition relaxation order of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, dated 10.04.2026 (M.M. Nerlikar, J.) in Criminal Application [APPP] No. 1203 of 2026 in Criminal Application [BA] No. 648 of 2024, Rakesh Ramkishor Khurana v. State of Maharashtra. Relaxes Condition No.(ix) of the order dated 19.12.2024 (attendance at the concerned police station twice a month on the 1st and 15th with recorded

What did the court decide?

Condition No.(ix) of the order dated 19.12.2024 relaxed; the applicant is no longer required to attend the police station as previously directed. The prayer relating to Condition No.(vii) (passport su

Rakesh S/O Ramkishor Khurana Vs the State of Maharashtra through Pso Ps Kelwad (Nagpur Rular ) and Economic Offenses With Nagpur — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:BHC-NAG:5697

100426appp1203.26

Order

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶6

CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APPP] NO. 1203 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION [BA] NO. 648 OF 2024.

¶7

Rakesh Ramkishor Khurana

¶8

VERSUS-

¶9

State of Maharashtra

¶10

Office notes, Office Memoranda of

¶11

Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders

¶12

or directions and Registrar’s orders.

¶13

Shri J.M. Gandhi, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri A.G. Mate, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant /State.

¶14

CORAM : M.M. NERLIKAR, J.

¶15

DATE : APRIL 10, 2026.

¶16

Heard.

¶17

The present application is filed seeking

¶18

relaxation of Condition Nos.(vii) and (ix) incorporated

¶19

in the order dated 19.12.2024, which reads as under :-

¶20

“(vii). The applicant shall surrender his passport if he is having before the Investigating Officer.

¶21

(viii) …

¶22

(ix) The applicant shall attend the concerned Police Station twice in a month on 1^st and 15^th of every month and the Investigating Officer or the Officer in-charge of the said Police Station shall record his presence.”

Rgd.

Order

100426appp1203.26

The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that validity of passport of the applicant is going to expire by the end of this year i.e. 2026, and therefore, he submits that at present he will not press prayer relating to condition no.(vii). He further submits that liberty be granted to file fresh application before expiry of the passport.

¶28

So far as condition No.(ix) is concerned, admittedly the order was passed on 19.12.2024 and almost one and a half years are over, the applicant is attending the police station, as was directed by condition no.(ix).

¶29

Learned A.P.P. opposes the application. Howevr, considering the above facts and circumstances, I am inclined to relax condition no.(ix). The applicant is now not required to attend the police station as was directed by the order dated 19.12.2024. Criminal application is partly allowed and disposed of.

¶30

JUDGE

¶31

Signed by: R.G. Dhuriya (RGD) Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Rgd. Date: 10/04/2026 15:15:42

Rakesh S/O Ramkishor Khurana v. the State of Maharashtra through Pso Ps Kelwad (Nagpur Rular ) and Economic Offenses With Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh S/O Ramkishor Khurana v. the State of Maharashtra through Pso Ps Kelwad (Nagpur Rular ) and Economic Offenses With Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases