Allowed¶33

Ravindra Bhima Shinde and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC27 Jan 2026APEAL/990/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory/pre-arrest bail appeal disposed on compromise: Bombay HC Aurangabad Bench, Crl. Appeal No. 990 of 2025, Ravindra Bhima Shinde v. State of Maharashtra; terms of compromise dated 08.03.2026 verified by Registrar (Judicial) (report 17.04.2026); complainant's consent affidavit dated 08.02.2026 (no objection, no coercion); A.P.P. submitted to Court's order; ad-interim order dated 24.12.2025 confirmed except Condition No. (ii); appeal allowed per prayer clauses [C] and [D]; disposed 06.05.2026 by Abhay J. Mantri, J.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Appeal allowed in terms of prayer clause [C] and [D]; ad-interim order dated 24th December, 2025 confirmed except Condition No. (ii) therein; Criminal Appeal thereafter disposed of. ¶33

Ravindra Bhima Shinde and Others vs the State of Maharashtra and Another — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

926-APEAL-990-25.odt

¶2

2026:BHC-AUG:20445

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 990 OF 2025

¶5

Ravindra Bhima Shinde and Others ..APPELLANTS

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

State of Maharashtra and Another

¶8

..RESPONDENTS

¶9

Mr. P.B. Vikhe, Advocate for Appellants Mr. V.M. Chate, A.P.P. for Respondent no.1 – State

¶10

Ms. Ashwini Lomte, Advocate h/f Mr. N.Y. Chavan, Advocate for Respondent No.2

¶11

CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : 06^th MAY, 2026

¶12

PER COURT :

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶14

Learned counsel for the Appellants and Respondent No. 2 submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. Accordingly, they have entered into terms of compromise on 08^th March, 2026 and tendered the same in the Court. The same is taken on record. The said terms of compromise were verified by the Registrar (Judicial), and he submitted his report before the Court on 17^th April, 2026.

¶15

Apart from that, Respondent No.2 has filed an affidavit dated 08^th

¶16

February, 2026 before the Court. It would be appropriate to reproduce

¶17

1 / 3

¶18

926-APEAL-990-25.odt

¶19

paragraph nos. 4 to 8 of the said affidavit as under:-

¶20

“4] In view of the amicable settlement and compromise, informant/resp.no.2 has no ill will or grudge against applicants/accused persons.

¶21

5] The settlement and compromise not only restored cordial relations between applicants and deponent but also between their other family members.

¶22

6] In view of the amicable settlement and compromise, deponent does not have objection to pass order in favour of applicants by way of allowing present criminal appeal for pre-arrest bail (Ravindra Bhima Shinde V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others) pending before this Hon’ble Court.

¶23

7] In view of compromise and amicable settlement, deponent requests to allow the criminal appeal for anticipatory bail.

¶24

8] The compromise and amicable settlement were as per the will and wish of the deponent. There was no force or coercion.”

¶25

In view of the terms of compromise as well as the affidavit, the Appellant as well as Respondent No.2 urged for disposal of the Appeal.

¶26

On perusal of the settlement terms and the affidavit, it clearly appears that the matter has been settled between the parties amicably. Accordingly, Respondent No.2/Complainant has given no objection to allowing this Appeal.

¶27

It further appears from the record that this Court on 24^th December, 2025, after hearing the parties, issued notice to the Respondents and in the

¶28

2 / 3

¶29

926-APEAL-990-25.odt

¶30

meantime ad-interim bail was granted to the Appellants, subject to the condition mentioned therein and said interim relief is continued till this date.

¶31

Learned A.P.P. does not dispute that an amicable settlement took place between the parties outside the Court, and therefore, he submitted to the order of the Court.

¶32

In view of the above, i.e. grant of ad-interim bail, filing of terms of compromise and affidavit of Respondent No.2 / Original Complainant for consenting to allowing this Appeal, I deem it appropriate to confirm the adinterim order dated 24^th December 2025, except Condition No. (ii) therein.

¶33

Consequently, Criminal Appeal is allowed in terms of prayer clause [C]

¶34

and [D] and the ad-interim order dated 24^th December, 2025, is confirmed.

¶35

10. Criminal Appeal is disposed of.

¶36

SSD

¶37

3 / 3

Ravindra Bhima Shinde and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra Bhima Shinde and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Renuka Nitin Bondre vs Nitin s/o Shriram Bondre

Satish Ramrao Gavale vs Vaishali Satish Gavale and Others

Rahul Bapurao Barve vs Swati Rahul Barve

Deepak Dadarao Ghayal vs Suresh Shivaji Pujari and Another

Deepak Dadarao Ghayal vs Manoj Balasaheb Thavare and Others

Deepak Dadarao Ghayal vs Ganesh Keshavrao Dake and Others