Uttam Shankar Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail allowed — Bombay High Court (Madhav J. Jamdar, J.), 9 January 2026 — ABA No. 40/2026 (Rakhi Ravindra Shah, Accused No.20) and ABA No. 45/2026 (Uttam Shankar Jadhav, Accused No.12) — C.R. No. 260/2024, Bandgarden (order: 'Bundgarden') Police Station, Pune — Sections 406, 409, 420 r/w 34 IPC — alleged mis-appropriation of Rs. 4,18,62,942/- from Sasoon General Hospital funds (period 31.07.2023–21.01.2024) — amounts traced to main accused Sachin Sasar; Applicants not shown as beneficiaries — custodial interrogation unnecessary — parity: main accused on regular bail (JMFC Pune, 03.05.2025, RCC 1482/2025); of 25 accused, 4 reports u/s 169 CrPC, 5 arrested granted regular bail, 4 anticipatory bail, 1 in jail — P.R. Bond Rs. 50,000/- each — counsel: Priyal G. Sarda with Shubham S. Sane and Seema Dighe; APPs R. V. Newton and S. M. Yadav.
What did the court decide?
Both Anticipatory Bail Applications allowed: in the event of arrest in connection with C.R. No. 260 of 2024 (Bundgarden Police Station, Pune), the Applicants are to be released on furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs. 50,000/- each with one or two solvent sureties each in the like amount, subject to conditions — attendance at the concerned Police Station as and when called by the Investigating Officer and cooperation with the investigation; furnishing cell phone number and residential address to the IO and keeping them updated; no inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case; no tampering with prosecution evidence and no contacting or influencing the Complainant or any witness; and not leaving India without prior permission of the Court.