Vikas Navnath Mote v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order; paucity of time; Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench; coram Manish Pitale and Y.G. Khobragade; dated 10 September 2025; matters under serial Nos. 976-1107 adjourned - writ petitions 2014-2025 to 01.12.2025-11.12.2025, and criminal applications, criminal PIL 4/2024, PIL 16/2024, suo motu PIL 1/2023, income tax appeal 48/2024 and certain civil applications to 08.10.2025-10.10.2025; directions to remove office objections and file affidavits in reply/rejoinder before the next date; ad-interim orders, if any, to continue until the next date; docket reference 'DPT 10.9'; no merits adjudicated, no citations.
What did the court decide?
All matters serially listed (Nos. 976-1107) adjourned due to paucity of time to the dates mentioned in the order, i.e., 01.12.2025 to 11.12.2025 for most writ-petition/PIL matters and 08.10.2025 to 10.10.2025 for criminal applications and certain other matters; office objections to be removed before the next date; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed on or before the next date; and, subject to that compliance, ad-interim orders, if any passed earlier, to continue until the next date.