Rohini Nilesh Mahadik v. Nilesh Yashwant Mahadik
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay HC, W.P. No. 9481 of 2024, Madhav J. Jamdar J., order dated 16.04.2025; Article 227 writ petition by mother against Family Court, Thane order dated 13.12.2023 below Exh.-18 in Petition No. A-223 of 2022 rejecting her interim-custody application and granting access order; alleged forcible taking of the child by father on 31.03.2022; heard and stood over to 28.04.2025, 04:30 p.m., Chamber.
What the court decided
921-WP-9481-2024.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9481 OF 2024
Digitally signed by SONALI SONALI MILIND MILIND PATIL PATIL Date: 2025.04.17 09:59:12 +0530
Rohini Nilesh Mahadik …Petitioner Versus Nilesh Yashwant Mahadik …Respondent
Mr. Sarawadnya S. Kadtane (through Video Conference) i/b. Law Supremus, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Shivani A. Halwai, for the Respondent.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 16th APRIL 2025
P. C.:
- Heard Mr. Kadtane, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Ms. Halwai, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent.
- By the present Writ Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the challenge is to the legality and validity of order dated 13th December 2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Thane below Exhibit-18 in Petition No.A-223 of 2022. By the said order, Application filed by the Petitioner-Wife for
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 13 December 2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Thane below Exhibit-18 in Petition No. A-223 of 2022 (rejecting the Petitioner-Wife's application for interim custody and granting an access order) is legal and valid.¶11
Procedural history
How this case reached the court
- Order under challenge
Order dated 13 December 2023 of the learned Judge, Family Court, Thane, below Exhibit-18 in Petition No. A-223 of 2022, by which the application filed by the Petitioner-Wife for interim custody of her son was rejected and an order regarding access of the son was granted.¶11
Family Court, Thane · 2023-12-13
- Prior proceeding
Petitioner's main contention: on 31 March 2022 the Respondent-Husband came to the Petitioner-Wife's house and took the child forcibly, against the will of the child and without informing her, while she was at her workplace.¶16
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court