Disposed¶28

Ashok Dattatraya Phanse Since Dec Thr His Legal Heirs and Ors. v. the Government of India Thr Its Defence and Ors.

Bombay HC10 Mar 2025WP/901/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court writ petition disposal 10/03/2025; representation/application dated 23/07/2024 decided on 03/03/2025; petitioner at liberty to challenge adjudication dated 03/03/2025; all points kept open; Government of India respondent; contempt petition no. 36 of 2025 disposed alongside; antecedent liberty in Writ Petition No. 9656 of 2024; AGP instructions order dated 05/02/2025.

What did the court decide?

Both the writ petition and the contempt petition disposed of; petitioner left free to challenge the adjudication dated 03/03/2025 in accordance with law if aggrieved, with all points kept open. ¶28

Ashok Dattatraya Phanse Since Dec Thr His Legal Heirs and Ors. vs the Government of India Thr Its Defence and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 34 WP-901-25 spktomin.doc

¶2

BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT

¶3

Digitally signed by BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2025.03.13 11:40:42 +0530

¶4

Corrected as per order dated 12/03/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 901 OF 2025

¶6

Mr. Ashok S/o. Dattatraya Phanse (Since deceased) through his Legal Heirs 1.1 Mrs. Meena Wd/o. Ashok Phanse (wife) and Others

¶7

… Petitioners

¶8

V/s

¶9

The Government of India and Others ….Respondents.

¶10

WITH

¶11

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.36 OF 2025

¶12

Mr. Ashok S/o. Dattatraya Phanse (Since … Petitioner deceased) through his Legal Heirs 1.1 Mrs. Meena Wd/o. Ashok Phanse (wife) and Others

¶13

V/s

¶14

The Government of India and Others ….Respondents.

¶15

Mr. Deepak C. Natu a/w Ms. Gayatri R. Soni i/b N. Deepak & Co., Advocates for the petitioner in the above Writ Petition as well as Contempt Petition.

¶16

Mr. S.H. Kankal, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos. 3 and 4 in Writ Petition No.901 of 2025.

¶17

Mr. S.H. Kankal, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1 and 2 in Contempt Petition No.36 of 2025.

¶18

Mr. Rui Rodrigues a/w Mr. Aniruddha A. Garge for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 in Writ Petition No.901 of 2025.

¶19

¶20

CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR & M. M. SATHAYE, JJ.

¶21

DATE : 10^TH MARCH, 2025

¶22

BDP-SPS

¶23

1/2

¶24

2 34 WP-901-25 spktomin.doc

¶25

P.C. :

¶26

1] By the order dated 05/02/2025, the learned Assistant Government Pleader was granted time to obtain instructions as to when the petitioner’s application dated 23/07/2024 would be decided. This direction was issued in view of liberty granted to the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 9656 of 2024 to make such representation.

¶27

2] Today it is informed that the petitioner’s application has been decided on 03/03/2025.

¶28

3] In view of the aforesaid, since the petitioner’s representation has been decided, it would be open for him to take appropriate steps and challenge the adjudication dated 03/03/2025 in accordance with law, if he is aggrieved with the same. All points in that regard are kept open. The writ petition as well as the contempt petition are accordingly disposed of.

¶29

(M. M. SATHAYE, J.)

¶30

(A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

¶31

BDP-SPS

¶32

2/2

Ashok Dattatraya Phanse Since Dec Thr His Legal Heirs and Ors. v. the Government of India Thr Its Defence and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Dattatraya Phanse Since Dec Thr His Legal Heirs and Ors. v. the Government of India Thr Its Defence and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jownder Singh Sethi vs Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd.

Sanjeevani Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Anr. vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Thore Vinod Huchappa and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Ors.

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited vs Mahanagar Pensioners Welfare Association

Sanjay Chandrakant Jagtap vs Authorised Officer Authum Investment and Infrastructure Limited and Ors.

Priyanka Communication (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Bank of India