Sagina Anis Khan v. State of Maharashtra Thr the Office of Government Pleader and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Vakalatnama not accepted by office; incorrect description of Respondent No. 4; Respondent No. 4 stated to be M/s. Mount Mary Builders; leave to amend writ petition granted; amendment within one week; office to accept vakalatnama after amendment; petition listed on 20 June 2025; Sagina Anis Khan v. State of Maharashtra; Bombay High Court; Writ Petition No. 8831 of 2024; M. S. Karnik and N. R. Borkar, JJ.; dated 9 June 2025; purely procedural/interlocutory order; no statutes or cases cited.
What did the court decide?
Interlocutory procedural directions (petition neither allowed nor dismissed): leave to amend granted to correct the description of Respondent No. 4 (to M/s. Mount Mary Builders), amendment to be carried out within one week; office thereafter to accept the vakalatnama for Respondent No. 4; petition to be listed on 20 June 2025.