Writ petition before the High Court at Bombay was dismissed as the petitioner's counsel did not appear before the Court on the hearing date.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8- WP 8477 of 2003.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8477 OF 2003
VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM
Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2025.11.14 19:34:21 +0530
The Nashik Merchants Coop Bank ltd. ...Petitioner
V/s.
Ahuja Industries and Ors. ...Respondents
None for Petitioner.
Ms. Gargi Warunjikar i/b. Dr. Uday P. Warunjikar for Respondent-3(c).
CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2025
P.C. :
No.3(c) and draws this Court's attention to paragraph 5 of the order dated 19th September 2025 and submits that this Court had made it clear that if none appears for the Petitioner on the next date, this Court would consider dismissing the Petition and, therefore, since none appears for the Petitioner, this Court dismiss the Petition.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Tikam 1/1
Vaishali Anil Tikam
The Nashik Merchants Coop Bank ltd.
Ahuja Industries and Ors.
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
