Single judge dismissed the writ petition because none appeared for the Petitioners, relying on a prior order of 19 September 2003 scheduled for action if unrepresented.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3- WP 3040 of 2003.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM
Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2025.11.14 19:10:09 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 3040 OF 2003
Kala Lal Hathiramani, Since deceased by her heirs Lal Premchand Hathi and Ors. ...Petitioners
V/s.
Sind Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. ...Respondent
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Suddhasattwa Roy i/by DSK Legal, for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2025
P.C. :
this Court's attention to order dated 19th September 2025 where in paragraph 5, this Court had made it clear that if none appears for the Petitioners on the next date, this Court would consider dismissing the Petition.
Tikam 1/2
3- WP 3040 of 2003.doc
submissions since none appears for the Petitioners, Petition stands dismissed.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Tikam 2/2
Kala Lal Hathiramani
Lal Premchand Hathi
Sind Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd.
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
