Allowed¶19

Ku. Vinita Mahadeorao Sonkusre (After Marriage Vinita Nivrutti Gadikar) v. the State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Ministry of School Education, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC18 Feb 2025WP/7395/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Supernumerary post; invalidation of caste claim; Government Resolution dated 21.12.2019; Government Resolution dated 14.12.2022; termination dated 09.09.2019 set aside; school education employee; State of Maharashtra; Education Officer communication dated 30.08.2024; Writ Petition No.6783/2019 withdrawn; writ petition allowed; Nagpur Bench; neutral citation 2025:BHC-NAG:3204-DB.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to act in consonance with the Government Resolutions dated 21.12.2019 and 14.12.2022; order of termination dated 09.09.2019 to stand set aside; pending application(s), if any, disposed of accordingly. ¶19

Ku. Vinita Mahadeorao Sonkusre (After Marriage Vinita Nivrutti Gadikar) vs the State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Ministry of School Education, Mumbai and Others — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:BHC-NAG:3204-DB

¶2

1 914.WP.7395-2024.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 7395 OF 2024

¶5

( Ku. Vinita Mahadeorao Sonkusre (after marriage Vinita Nivrutti Gadikar)

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra, Thr. its Secretary, Ministry of School Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai & Ors. )

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

¶9

Mr. R.S. Parsodkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A.M. Joshi, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3/State.

¶10

CORAM: AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

¶11

DATED : 28^th MARCH, 2025

¶12

Heard Mr. Parsodkar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Joshi, learned AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3/State.

¶13

2 . Mr. N.D. Khamborkar, learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 is absent.

¶14

3 . The Petition seeks a direction, to implement the Government Resolutions dated 21.12.2019 and 14.12.2022, whereby on account of invalidation of caste claim the employee is directed to be put on supernumerary post.

¶15

4 . Mr. Parsodkar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, upon instructions makes a statement, that Writ Petition

¶16

2 914.WP.7395-2024.odt

¶17

No.6783/2019 filed by the Petitioner challenging invalidation of her cast claim, is being withdrawn by him.

¶18

5 . Mr. Joshi, learned AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3/State, does not dispute, that the aforesaid Government Resolutions are in force and are required to be implemented. In fact, the communication dated 30.08.2024 (page 57) on record indicates, that the Education Officer himself has written to the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5, to act in consonance with the aforesaid Government Resolutions.

¶19

6 . In that view of the matter, we allow the Petition and direct the Respondents to act in consonance with the aforesaid Government Resolutions.

¶20

7 . Needles to say, that in view of the above, the logical consequence would be that the order of termination dated 09.09.2019 shall stand set aside.

¶21

8 . Pending application/s, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly.

¶22

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

¶23

SD. Bhimte

¶24

Signed by: Mr.S.D.Bhimte Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 28/03/2025 18:14:09

Ku. Vinita Mahadeorao Sonkusre (After Marriage Vinita Nivrutti Gadikar) v. the State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Ministry of School Education, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ku. Vinita Mahadeorao Sonkusre (After Marriage Vinita Nivrutti Gadikar) v. the State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Ministry of School Education, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Hemraj S/O Watuji Walthare Vs the Assistant Registrar, Milk and Fisheries Devpt. Office, Bhandara and Another

M/S. Real Act Technology Thr. Proprietor, Mr. Mangesh Sawwalakhe Vs Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Thr. Its Head Officer (Medicine) and Anr.

Shri. Bharat S/O. Maroti Tonchar vs Narayan Kisan Lambhade, President, Ahilyadevi Shikshan Prasarak Va Bahuu. Mandal, Ukalipen and Anr.

M/S. Srivari Textiles, Nagpur, Represented Thr. Authorized Signatory, Yogesh Fattelal Rathi vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Principal Secretary, Finance Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

The Blind Relief Association Nagpur, Thr. Its Secretary and Others vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Persons With Disabilities Welfare Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Prof. Sanjay S/O Krushnarao Fulkar and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept., Mumbai and Ors.