Asha Tukaram Rawate v. State of Maharashtra through District Collect and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment/continuation order, Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench, judge Arun R. Pedneker, dated 18/12/2025; batch adjournment due to paucity of time covering writ petitions (led by WP 456/2025 and WP 457/2025, adjourned to 8.1.2026), second appeals (SA 664/2019, SA 424/2020, SA 157/2024, SA 488/2023, SA 55/2022, SA 375/2022 with SA 527/2023, SA 425/2023, SA 133/2025, SA 332/2019, SA 142/2022, SA 163/2022, SA 256/2022, SA 289/2024), arbitration application ARB/30/2023, arbitration appeals ARBA/29/2009 and ARBA/52/2024, and contempt petitions CP/49/2006 (in WP/2764/2004) and CP/230/2005 (in WP/1799/1994); interim relief/undertaking/statement continues till next date; useful for tracking hearing schedules and continuity of interim protections, not for citing any legal doctrine.
What did the court decide?
Any existing interim relief/undertaking/statement in these matters shall continue till the next hearing date