Rajmohan Narsingh Rao v. Bank of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court common adjournment order dated 23.04.2025 (A.S. Chandurkar & M.M. Sathye, JJ) passed on account of paucity of time; Daily and Supplementary Board matters (Appellate Side and Original Side, Sr. Nos. 32-75) adjourned to CIS-fixed dates between 20.06.2025 and 25.07.2025; existing ad-interim/interim relief continued till respective next dates. Keywords: paucity of time, adjournment, common order, interim relief continuation, CIS board dates.
What did the court decide?
Administrative adjournment: remaining matters on the Daily and Supplementary Board (Sr. Nos. 32-75, Appellate Side and Original Side) adjourned to the dates fixed as per the CIS (20.06.2025 to 25.07.2025); ad-interim or interim relief operative on the date of the order continues till the respective next dates, and ad-interim reliefs not granted for a limited period remain unaffected.