Vinayak Parshuram Paradkar and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Purely procedural/administrative matter - no substantive ruling. Bombay High Court (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) common order dt. 27.01.2025 by RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.: hearing of Board matters (serial nos. 51 to 163 as per chart) deferred due to paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; replies/rejoinders, if any, to be filed before next date; ad-interim/interim orders, if any, to continue; matters posted 14.02.2025 to 12.03.2025 under Fresh Admissions, Urgent Admissions, Urgent Orders and Due Admissions categories. Keywords: Bombay High Court; common order; adjournment; paucity of time; office objections; interim order continue; fresh admissions; urgent admissions; due admissions; Ghuge; Patil. Contains no ratio decidendi; unsuitable for citation as precedent.
What did the court decide?
Administrative directions only: (i) all office objections to be removed within two weeks; (ii) affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed before the next date; (iii) ad-interim/interim order, if any granted earlier, to continue subject to such compliance; (iv) matters re-listed between 14.02.2025 and 12.03.2025 - serial nos. 51-56, 58-70, 71-87 (Fresh Admissions), 88-104 (Urgent Admissions), 105 (Urgent Orders), 107-111, 113-131, 133-150, 151-163 (Due Admissions).