Neeraj Bhatia v. Income Tax Officer and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Brief post-hearing ('P.C.') order of the Bombay High Court allowing a criminal writ petition. Petitioner: Neeraj Bhatia (counsel Sagar Tilak with Sachin Hande and Preshita Adamane). Respondents: Income Tax Officer and Ors. (counsel YS Bhate); State represented by APP Swapnil S Pednekar. Decisive fact: respondents' reply-affidavit admission that the petitioner was not a director of Digital Infotainment Pvt. Ltd. (accused No.1) at the relevant time. Disposition: petition allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). Bench: R.N. Laddha, J. Decision date: 13 March 2025. No statutory provisions, cited cases, or monetary amounts appear in the text.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed in terms of prayer clause (b); the substance of prayer clause (b) is not set out in the judgment. ¶16