Harshuprasad Matadin Pande v. Mataprasad Mahavir Pande and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Writ Petition No. 566 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, decided 5 March 2025 by R.N. Laddha, J. Petitioners Harshuprasad Matadin Pande & Anr. v. Respondents Mataprasad Mahavir Pande and Anr. Advocates: Jitendra Mishra with Rupesh Dubey and Nilu Mishra for petitioners; Neha Upadhyay instructed by/briefing Mahesh Tiwari for respondent No.1; Arfan Sait, APP, for the State. Concerns C.C. No.737/PW/2006 (N M Joshi Marg Police Station, Mumbai; WPSI Ubale present for Pairavi); respondent No.1 as complainant withdrew intention to lead additional evidence and abandoned application under Section 311 CrPC; petition disposed of as nothing survived.
What did the court decide?
In view of respondent No.1's stated position that he does not intend to present additional evidence and will not press/pursue the application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C., nothing survives in the writ petition and it stands disposed of accordingly.