Disposed¶15

Dr. Gauri Abhishek Chavan v. Abhishek Ajit Chavan

Bombay HC17 Jun 2025WP/564/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Petition No. 564 of 2025; Bombay High Court; Manjusha Deshpande, J.; order dated 18.07.2025; Dr. Gauri Abhishek Chavan v. Abhishek Ajit Chavan; Family Court Mumbai; challenge to order dated 08.05.2024; objection to Respondent's evidence contradicting pleadings; admission and denial of documents; deferment of hearing to 22.07.2025; listing on 21.07.2025 urgent circulation; time-bound matter to be decided by 31.05.2026; interim procedural order; no merits decided; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Interim procedural directions only: the Family Court was requested to defer the hearing up to 22nd July 2025; the Writ Petition was to be listed on 21st July 2025 in the urgent circulation category; parties to act on an authenticated copy of the order. No adjudication on the merits of the challenge. ¶15

Dr. Gauri Abhishek Chavan vs Abhishek Ajit Chavan — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

903-WP-564-2025.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 564 OF 2025

¶4

Dr. Gauri Abhishek Chavan .. Petitioner versus Abhishek Ajit Chavan .. Respondent

¶5

Mr. Akshay Kulkarni, for the Petitioner.

¶6

Mr. R.T. Lalwani a/w Mr. J.K. Shah, Ms. Namrata Thakur and Ms. Pooja Shah i/b RJ Law, for the Respondent.

¶7

CORAM: MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 18^th JULY, 2025

¶8

P.C:-

¶9

1. The Petitioner is challenging the order dated 08^th May 2024 passed by the Family Court, Mumbai. According to the Petitioner, the evidence of the Respondent is altogether different from the pleadings; therefore, he has objected to it. The Family Court has passed an order dated 08^th May 2024 holding that the point raised by the Petitioner can be considered at a later stage since he is at liberty to point out the contradiction at the relevant time. Accordingly, the Application has been disposed of.

1 of 2

Darshan Patil

903-WP-564-2025.doc

2. The Petitioner has circulated this matter as the hearing of the matter before the Family Court is going on as per the directions issued by this Court. Since it is a time-bound matter, it has to be decided by 31^st May 2026.

¶14

3. The Petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Family Court in the present Writ Petition. Since the arguing Counsel of the Petitioner is not available today, he seeks adjournment and makes a request that the matter may be kept later. However, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent submits that the matter is actually listed today for the ‘admission and denial of documents’, though on board it shows for ‘evidence’.

¶15

4. Learned Family Court is requested to defer the hearing of the matter upto 22^nd July 2025.

¶16

5. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order.

¶17

6. List on 21^st July 2025 in the urgent circulation category.

¶18

[MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.]

¶19

2 of 2

¶20

Darshan Patil