Firdoz Shirin Azhar Ahmed Deshmukh v. the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Aurangabad Bench (Bombay High Court) consolidated adjournment order dated 24.09.2025 by Justice Arun R. Pedneker: over a hundred matters - writ petitions (Nos. 10817/2021, 6929/2022, 10799/2021, 1148 and 1149 of 2023, 1975/2023, 6502-6504/2023 and numerous petitions of 2023-2025), second appeals (Nos. 91/1998, 253/2000, 299/1998, 450 and 451 of 2008, 779/2006, 584 and 585 of 2010, 619/2014, 13/2016, 50/2016, 81/2016, 47/2018, 838/2018, 194, 423, 792, 813 of 2022, 30/2020, 338/2020, 712/2022, 97/2014, 635/2012, 1138/2004, 197, 230, 276, 353, 374 of 2024), their connected civil applications, and Review Application (Civil) No. 155 of 2013 in SA/708/2010 - adjourned due to paucity of time to 19.12.2025, 22.12.2025, 23.12.2025 or 24.12.2025; existing interim relief, undertakings and statements to continue till the next date. No merits adjudicated.
What did the court decide?
Purely procedural batch adjournment: all listed matters (serials 963-1068) adjourned due to paucity of time to the dates shown against them - 19.12.2025 (e.g., Writ Petition Nos. 7057, 7110, 7120, 7200, 7423, 7778, 8472, 8828, 10182, 10414 of 2025), 22.12.2025 (group led by Writ Petition No. 10817 of 2021, incl. Second Appeal Nos. 450 and 451 of 2008), 23.12.2025 (group incl. Review Application (Civil) No. 155 of 2013 in SA/708/2010) and 24.12.2025 (group led by Second Appeal No. 197 of 2024); interim relief / undertakings / statements, if any, in these matters shall continue till the next date. No substantive issue adjudicated.