Nilesh Dattatray Patil and Others v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Paucity-of-time adjournment order, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad; Coram Manish Pitale and Y. G. Khobragade, JJ.; dated 17 July 2025. Batch adjournment of writ petitions (list serial nos. 991-1104, with gaps, plus connected civil applications) to dates 08.09.2025 through 23.09.2025; office objections to be removed; reply/rejoinder affidavits to be filed before next date; previously granted ad-interim orders to continue until next date. Contains no ratio decidendi, statutory discussion or precedent treatment; useful only to confirm listing dates and continuation of interim protection.
What did the court decide?
Batch adjournment: the listed writ petitions (with connected matters and civil applications) are adjourned due to paucity of time to the dates mentioned against them, ranging from 08.09.2025 to 23.09.2025 across 'urgent admission', 'due admission' and 'final hearing' categories. Office objections shall be removed before the next date; affidavit in reply / rejoinder, if any, to be filed on or before the next date; and, subject to that compliance, ad-interim orders, if any passed earlier, would continue until the next date.