M/S Ion Infrastructure Throu.Its Sole Prop Mukesh Lakhani v. City and Industrial Development Corporation and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay HC, W.P. Nos. 5279 & 5472 of 2025, order dt. 24-04-2025, Coram: Alok Aradhe CJ & M.S. Karnik J. Petitioners M/s. ION Infrastructure and M/s. Patel Developers challenge CIDCO's letters of termination of lease dated 01-04-2025 terminating agreements for failure to develop plot; Petitioners cite ad-interim injunction dt. 27-11-2019 by learned Single Judge in AO No. 39 of 2017 (filed by Respondent No.3) as preventing development; cancellation alleged arbitrary/unreasonable. CIDCO counsel sought accommodation to take instructions; matter listed 28-04-2025. Interim/adjournment order; no merits decided; no statutes or precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
No relief decided on merits. Short accommodation granted to learned Counsel for Respondent – CIDCO to seek instructions; Petitions listed on 28th April 2025. ¶27