Umeshchandra Kshatrapal Yadav v. the State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, School Edu. and Sport Dept.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court common administrative order dated 16/12/2025, Coram Ravindra V. Ghuge & Ashwin D. Bhobe JJ.; matters not taken up due to paucity of time at 6.15 pm rising; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders to continue; reply/rejoinder one week before next date; spare copies within 14 days failing which dismissal against unserved respondents on 15th day; listing chart 23/12/2025 to 13/02/2026 (Urgent/Due/Fresh Admission, Prioritized Cases, Disposal, Dismissal, Final Hearing); purely procedural, no substantive ruling.
What did the court decide?
Purely administrative/scheduling common order: matters on the board could not be heard for paucity of time and were listed per the chart in paragraph 7 (dates ranging 23/12/2025 to 13/02/2026); office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders, if any, to continue; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed at least one week before the next date; matters awaiting service to be put up after service; petitioners to supply spare copies within 14 days, failing which matters to stand dismissed against unserved respondents on the 15th day.