Disposed¶35

Lailabi Raosaheb Nadaf v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Bombay HC24 Jan 2025WP/4834/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP 913/2024 Ajay Vasantrao Naik v. State of Maharashtra; Bombay HC; Sambre & Bhobe JJ.; 24-01-2025; batch of connected writ petitions incl. WP 1743/2024, WP 2443/2024, WPL 15029/2024 and CP 47/2024 & CP 64/2024 in WP 1364/2021; Respondent No.2 BMC; Respondent No.3 BEST undertaking; affidavit-in-reply by State; two weeks' last chance to BMC for additional affidavit; liability of payment part discharge; further funds for discharging liability; procedural/interim order; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks' time, as last chance, granted to Respondent No.2 to file an additional affidavit; Respondent No.2 to be sensitive to Respondent No.3's submission regarding discharge of the payment liability and provision of further funds by Respondent No.2. Main petitions remain pending. ¶35

Lailabi Raosaheb Nadaf vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

28 wp 913-24 and ors.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.913 OF 2024

¶5

Ajay Vasantrao Naik and anr. … Petitioners V/s.

¶6

State of Maharashtra and ors. … Respondents

¶7

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.30691 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.913 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1743 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2443 OF 2024 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.64 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1364 OF 20241

¶8

WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.15029 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1183 OF 20243 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1182 OF 20243 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1343 OF 20243 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3523 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3536 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1032 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1034 OF 20243 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1041 OF 20243 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1057 OF 2023 WITH

¶9

Priya Soparkar

¶10

Digitally signed by PRIYA PRIYA RAJESH RAJESH SOPARKAR SOPARKAR Date: 2025.01.29 16:30:02 +0530

¶11

¶12

28 wp 913-24 and ors.doc

¶13

WRIT PETITION NO.917 OF 20243 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.870 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1012 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.970 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4834 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1053 OF 20243 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1165 OF 20243 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3644 OF 2022 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.47 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1364 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1052 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1170 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1137 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1212 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1018 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.647 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1033 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.881 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.650 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1024 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1016 OF 2023

¶14

Priya Soparkar

¶15

¶16

28 wp 913-24 and ors.doc

¶17

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.932 OF 2023 WITH

¶18

WRIT PETITION NO.1127 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1173 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.957 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1114 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.871 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1164 OF 2023 AND WRIT PETITION NO.1036 OF 2023

¶19

Mr. R.D. Bhat, Advocate for the Petitioners in WP No. 913 of 2024. Ms. Sapana Rachure, Advocate for the Petitioner in WPs No. 1183 of 2023, 1182/2023, 1143/2023, 3523/2022, 3536/2022, 1032/2023, 1034/2023, 1041/2023, 1057/2023, 917/2023, 870/2023, 1012/2023, 970/2023, 1053/2023, 1165/2023, 3644/2022, 1052/2023, 1070/2023, 137/2023, 1212/2023, 1018/2023, 647/2023, 1033/2023, 881/2023, 650/2023, 1024/2023, 1016/2023, 932/2023, 1127/2023, 1173/2023, 957/2023, 1114/2023, 871/2023, 1164/2023 and 1136/2023.

¶20

Ms. Gauatri H. Nayak with Mr. Akash Tayade and Mr. Raj Gupta i/by R. P. Khobragade, Advocates for the Petitioners in WPs No.1743/2024, 2443/2024 and WPL No.15029/2024.

¶21

Mr. Kaustubh Gidh, Advocate for the Petitioners in CP No.47/2024 and CP No.64/2024.

¶22

Ms. Shilpa Redkar with Mr. Shivprasad Borade, Advocates for the Respondent No.2(BMC).

¶23

Mr. Vishal Talsania with Mr.Sumeet Palsuledesai i/by M/s M. V. Kini & Co., Advocates for the Respondent BEST in all matters except WP No.913/2024, CPs No.47/2024 and 64 of 2024 and WP No.2443/2024. Mr. Nikhil Sakhardande, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishal Talsani, Mr. Sagar Shetty, Mr.Ashish Venugopal, Ms.Shraddha Nagaonkar, Ms. Iti Aggarwal i/by Mr.Sagar Shetty, Advocates for the Respondent No. 3- BEST undertaking in WPs No.913/2024 and 2443/2024 and WPL No.150/2024, CPs No.47/2024 and 64/2024.

¶24

Priya Soparkar

¶25

4 28 wp 913-24 and ors.doc

¶26

Ms. Vaishali Choudhari, Addl. GP with Ms. Rita Joshi, AGP for the State in WPs No.913/2024 and 1743 of 2024.

¶27

Ms. Sheetal Malvankar, AGP for the State in WP 2443/2024.

¶28

Ms. Uma Palsuledasai, AGP for the State in WP No.1364/2021 and CP 64/2024.

¶29

Ms. Jaymala Ostwal, Addl. GP for the State in WPL No.15029/2024.

¶30

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

¶31

DATE : 24^th JANUARY, 2025.

¶32

P.C. :

¶33

The Respondent No.1-State has filed affidavit-in-reply.

¶34

Contentions wherein are sought to be controverted by the counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 by filing an additional affidavit within a period of two weeks from today.

¶35

As such, we grant time of two weeks, by way of last chance to the Respondent No. 2.

¶36

Respondent No.2 should be sensitive to the submissions of to Respondent No.3 that the liability of payment in part discharge pursuant to the funds provided by Respondent No.2 and it is for Respondent No.2 to provide further funds for discharging the liability.

¶37

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)

¶38

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶39

Priya Soparkar

Lailabi Raosaheb Nadaf v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lailabi Raosaheb Nadaf v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anil P Bodke vs Deputy Chief Vigilance Officer, Mumbai Port Authority

Shreenath Ramakant Gawade and Ors. vs State of Maharastra Dept of School Education Throu. Principal Sec. and Ors.

Arjun Vitthal Chavan vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

International Human Rights Council (Human Rights Organisation )through Its General Secretary Mumbai vs Mumbai International Airport Ltd. and Ors.

Manisha Nagnath Tale vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary School Education and Sports Dept. and Ors.

Jyotsna Laxman Devgunde and Anr. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary School Education and Sports and Ors.