The Union of India Through Deputy Salt Commissioner v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC31 Jan 2025WP/4769/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Union of India Deputy Salt Commissioner v. State of Maharashtra; MMRDA; WP 4769/2024 Bombay High Court; connected WP 5362/2024, WP 471/2021, IA 363, IAL 6941/2021, IA 408/2021; land allotment by Central Government to State Government; change of user of land pending before Central Government; adjournment to 28 April 2025; interim orders continued; Coram Alok Aradhe CJ and M.S. Karnik J.; order dated 17 March 2025; no final adjudication.

What did the court decide?

No merits decision rendered; as jointly prayed by the parties the matters were listed on 28th April 2025, with interim orders, if any, granted on earlier occasions, to continue till the next date of hearing. ¶¶26

The Union of India Through Deputy Salt Commissioner vs State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Digitally signed JYOTIPRAKASH by JYOTIPRAKASHPAWAR PAWAR Date: 2025.03.18 12:05:57 +0530

¶2

JPP 26. WP 4769.24.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 4769 OF 2024

¶5

The Union of India through Deputy Salt Commissioner

¶6

… Petitioner

¶7

V/s.

¶8

State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents

¶9

with

¶10

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2024 in WRIT PETITION NO. 4769 OF 2024 with WRIT PETITION NO. 5362 OF 2024 with WRIT PETITION NO. 471 OF 2021 with INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 6941 OF 2021 in WRIT PETITION NO. 471 OF 2021 with INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 408 OF 2021 in

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO. 471 OF 2021

¶12

Mr. R.V. Govilkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gauraj Shah, Mr. D.P. Singh and Mr. Rui Rodrigues for the Petitioner in WP 4769/24 and for Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 in other Petitions

¶13

Dr. Birendra Saraf, Advocate General with Mr. Chirag Shah with Vishal Acharya i/b. Syamsundar B. Jadhav for Respondent No.3 – MMRDA in WP 4769/24

¶14

Mr. Aditya Bapat with Mr. Shehzad A.K, Najam-es-sani i/b. Maneksha & Sethna for the Petitioner in WP 5362/24 and for the Applicant in IA 363/25 and IAL 6941/21 and IA 408/21

¶15

Mr. Saket Mone with Mr. Subit Chakrabarti i/b. Vidhii Partners for Respondent - MMRDA in WP 471/21

¶16

Mr. Milind More, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in WP 4769/24

¶17

1/2

¶18

JPP 26. WP 4769.24.doc

¶19

Dr. Birendra Saraf, AG with Mr. Milind More, Addl.G.P. with Ms. Pooja Patil, AGP for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in IA 363/25 in WP 4769/24 Mr. Abhay L. Patki, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in WP 5362/24 Dr. Birendra Saraf, AG with Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP for Respondent Nos.1,2 and 3 in WP 471/21, IAL 6941/21 and IA 408/21

¶20

CORAM : ALOK ARADHE, CJ. AND M.S. KARNIK, J.

¶21

DATE : 17^th MARCH 2025

¶22

P.C. :

¶23

Learned Advocate General submitted that the Central Government has already taken a decision to allot the land in question to the State Government. The State Government has initiated the proceedings seeking change of user of the land which is pending before the Central Government.

¶24

In view of aforesaid submission, Mr. Govilkar, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Union of India prays for adjournment to enable him to seek instructions.

¶25

As jointly prayed by the parties, list on 28^th April 2025.

¶26

Interim order, if any, granted on earlier occasion, shall continue till next date of hearing

¶27

( M.S. KARNIK, J. ) ( CHIEF JUSTICE )

¶28

2/2

The Union of India Through Deputy Salt Commissioner v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Union of India Through Deputy Salt Commissioner v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Everest Enterprises Thr. Its Sole Proprietor Dhawal Khanna vs Hindustan Aeronautics Limited and Anr.

Nalanda Bahuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha, through Authorized Representative Mr. Bhaskar Kaduba Shinde vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Tribal Development Department

Pmp Infra Tech Pvt. Ltd. vs Bharat Petro Resources Ltd.

Firoz Khurshed Jamshedji vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shahbaz Mumtaz Khan vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

State of Maharashtra through the Collector of Stamps Mumbai City vs Pinak Bharat and Co. and Ors.