Disposed¶7

Malhar Muranjan v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Bombay HC3 Dec 2025WP/4433/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common order 03.12.2025 (Ravindra V. Ghuge & Ashwin D. Bhobe, JJ.); paucity of time at 5.35 p.m.; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders to continue; affidavit in reply/rejoinder one week before next date; spare copies within 14 days; dismissal against unserved respondents on 15th day; notice returnable after four weeks; listing 06.01.2026 to 14.01.2026; Fresh Admission; Urgent Admission; Due Admission.

What did the court decide?

Continuation of ad-interim/interim orders earlier granted, subject to compliance (including removal of office objections within two weeks); matters not heard and listed for January 2026. ¶7

Malhar Muranjan vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE

¶2

Common Order-3.12.2025.odt

¶3

Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2025.12.04 14:32:40 +0530

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION/ CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 3^rd December, 2025.

¶6

P.C. :-

¶7

At the time of rising at 5.35 p.m., the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No. 7 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

¶8

In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.

¶9

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.

¶10

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed at least one week before the next date.

¶11

Matters in which service of notice is awaited, put up after service.

¶12

Matters in which though notices were issued, the office could not process the notice due to non-supply of spare copies, the Petitioner shall supply spare copies for issuance of notice within 14 days, failing which, the matters in which copies are not supplied, would stand dismissed as against the unserved Respondents on the 15^th day. If copies are supplied, office to issue notice to the unserved

¶13

1 of 2

¶14

Trupti

¶15

Common Order-3.12.2025.odt

¶16

Respondents, returnable after four weeks.

¶17

7. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-

¶18

Serial Nos. of matters on the Board	To be listed on	To be listed in the category
7 to 12	06.01.2026	Fresh Admission
14 to 38	06.01.2026	Fresh Admission
40 to 80	07.01.2026	Fresh Admission
81 to 101	08.01.2026	Fresh Admission
103 to 128	09.01.2026	Fresh Admission
129 and 130	12.01.2026	Urgent Admission
131 to 152	12.01.2026	Due Admission
155 to 198	13.01.2026	Due Admission
200 to 216	14.01.2026	Due Admission
218 and 219	14.01.2026	Due Admission

¶19

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶20

2 of 2

¶21

Trupti

Malhar Muranjan v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Malhar Muranjan v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Unique Fortune Enterprises vs Brihanmumbai Mahangarpalika (Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai)

Samson Sebastian Chirayil vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Sec. School Edu. and Sports Dept. and Ors.

Vinashree Vijay Maske vs State of Maharashtra Thru. Secretary and Ors.

Nooralam Khan vs the Regional Passport Office through Ministry of External Affairs

Indrajeet Singh Thakur vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Higher and Technical Edu. Dept.

Sagir Ahmed Abdul Rauf Qureshi vs the Municipal Commissioner